The Persian Wars: Reasons for War

A thorough analysis of a conflict involves an examination of, not only the actors and actions, but also an understanding the underlying causes. Although the ancient historian Herodotus is the "authoritative" source for the Persian Wars, he still provides insight as to the origins of the conflict.

Persian forces had pretty much overwhelmed Greek communities throughout Hellas and on the coast of Asia Minor. The onslaught of the Great Persian King (whomever held that position at the time) seemed to be unstoppable. Oddly, it was a misinterpretation of the Delphic oracle that sparked the initial dispute between Croesus and Cyrus, and a correct interpretation of the oracle, by Themistocles (Histories, Book VII, 141), which led to an Aeginian/Athenian victory at Salamis and the end of the wars (Histories, Book VIII, 40 -112).

The Lydian King, Croesus (pictured above), ruled from about 560 to 547 BCE according to Herodotus. He originally sought advice from the oracle of Apollo at Delphi regarding the outcome of a battle, should he decide to attack the Persian King Cyrus (pictured left). The oracle declared that "if he attacked the Persians he would bring down a mighty empire" (Histories, Book I, 91). Assuming that it would be the mighty Persian empire that was brought down, Croesus felt confident and began to attack the Persians. But after a few victories in the area that separated Lydia from Persia, Croesus' luck took a turn for the worse. At the Lydian city of Sardis, Croesus was defeated by Cyrus. (Histories, Book I, 84)

It has been noted by "Sergei Andropov" that the Persian Wars were more than just a conquest by successive Persian kings, power hungry for world domination. In fact, the wars were a series of reciprocal conflicts between the Persians and various Greek nations. It would be inaccurate to group all of these nations together and describe them as "Greece," because the Athenian led "Delian League" and the "Peloponnesian League," had not even been established at the time. Most of the Hellenic city-states considered themselves independent, and took pride in their own culture, customs and traditions. Andropov complains that:

"People tend to forget that Xerxes' purpose in invading Greece was not to conquer it (that being more of a side benefit), but to punish the Athenians for torching Sardis and thereby royally pissing off his dad, [Darius]"

But, what Andropov seems to forget is that Sardis was not originally under Persian control.
Here is a link to a map of Greece and the Eastern Mediterranean, click "Area 7" to see the location of Sardis in Asia Minor.

Lydia is located in an area that was known as Ionia, and under the rule of the Great King Darius, the Ionians revolted against the Persian tyranny (Book V, 28 - VI 32) In a plea for assistance in the Ionian Fight for Freedom, Aristagoras went to Sparta, for the Spartan military was the best. However, the Spartans refused to lend a hand, and selfishly turned Aristagoras away. The next most powerful city-state was Athenians, and the noble Athenians knew that wherever the Fight for Freedom may be, it was the duty of every free nation to stop the spread of tyranny (Book V, 97).

The Ionian Revolt was not successful at that time, however, but the spirit of Freedom left a lasting impression on Darius' twisted soul. Herodotus explains that:
[N]ews was brought to Darius that Sardis had been taken and burnt by the Athenians and Ionians, and that the prime mover in the joint enterprise was Aristagoras of Miletus. The story goes that when Darius learnt of the disaster, he did not give a thought to the Ionians, knowing perfectly well that the punishment for their revolt would come; but he asked who the Athenians were, and then, on being told [no doubt of the Freedoms that they (the Athenians) enjoyed], called for his bow. He took it, set an arrow on the string, shot it up into the air and cried: 'Grant, O God, that I may punish the Athenians.' Then he commanded one of his servants to repeat to him the words, 'Master, remember the Athenians', three times, whenever he sat down to dinner. (Book V, 105)

This fanaticism is the mark of an unhealthy ideology, and although the Ionian revolt failed, the Athenians (with Freedom on their side) would wind up driving the barbarians back into the desert.

It was Xerxes' navy that the Athenians defeated, and it could be argued that he was simply attempting to take revenge for the burning of Sardis. However, was revenge the only reason the Persians invaded Attica?

Plutarch provides a clue in his Life of Aristides,

When Datis was sent out by king Darius, on the pretext of punishing the Athenians for the burning of Sardis, but really to subdue the whole of Greece, he landed all his forces at Marathon and proceeded to ravage the countryside. (Life of Aristides, 5.1)

This means that Darius was 'upset' about the burning of Sardis, but according to Plutarch, the Great King used the incident as a pretext for conquest.

11 comments:

Sergei Andropov said...

"Andropov seems to forget that Sardis was not originally under Persian control"

It's not so much that I forgot it as that Darius forgot it (or just didn't care). At the time it was sacked, Sardis was a major Persian administrative center, it's loss is what prompted Darius's famous thrice daily reminders to "Remember the Athenians."

Also, my goal was not so much to complain as to inform you of the Persian point of view, which I had become acquainted with over the summer when I took an intensive Persian course at Berkeley. To the Persians, the most important part of the various squabbles between the Greeks and the Achaemenids was the total annihilation of Persepolis. Salamis is where Western civilization was almost destroyed; Persepolis is where Achaemenid civilization was destroyed.

PJ said...

Sergei,

I'm just having some fun, making my blog sound more important than it really is. However, I do appreciate the insight you provide, and I can re-word the text so it does not sound like a polemic against your point. Your comment made me rethink the way I had been presenting The Histories thus far. It occurred to me that the causes and motivations for war are important factors that I had not yet addressed.

The Persian Wars, as with all wars, are complicated, and the simplistic statement that I had made:

"Salamis was arguably the most important battle in Western civilization"

is not sufficient.

Sergei Andropov said...

Relax, my idea of a polemic is something Ralph would say.

It's so much easier to civilly discuss world events when they aren't current ;)

Unknown said...

Mak,

I guess I'm feeling a bit grouchy today, but I think you should go back and proofread this post. It has a few grammatical errors and what I consider to be some run-on sentences.

It also contains one of my pet peeves, the use of "lead" as the past tense of the verb "lead":

"the Spartan lead Peloponnesian League"

That should really be "the Spartan-led Peloponnesian League."

I don't want to seem picky about this stuff, but I know that elsewhere you're usually pretty good in correcting such errors, and you seem to be striving for a professional-looking site.

Concerning the content, I cannot be critical as this is a historical period of which I know next-to-nothing. I appreciate learning more about these times by visiting your site.

Egreggious

PJ said...

Egreggious,

You are correct, and I do appreciate the any and all corrections that people find (as long as they are, indeed, mistakes on my part). This post was writen at about... oh... 5am, after I had re-read the first 2 books of Herodotus. I was infuriated (just kidding:) with Sergei's comment on the post below, so I needed to crank out a response with haste!

For while the Athenians my have acted in events that happened immediately prior to the savage Persian invasion of Attica...

The Persians started it! So there!

Seriously though, I have not had time to proof read many of these posts, so thank you for bring that matter to my attention.

Sergei Andropov said...

"The Persians started it! So there!"

Read the Shahnameh. The Persians started everything ;)

ralph said...

MAKARIOS, WHAT ARE YOU DOING????????

I SAW YOU POSTING OVER AT THE LIBTARDED NEWSHOUNDS SO-CALLED "OFF-TOPIC" SECTION!!!!!!!!

YOU AND I BOTH KNOW THAT THEY ARE ALWAYS SO OFF-TOPIC THAT IT'S LAUGHABLE!!!!!!!!

THEY CAN'T EVEN THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BUT THERE YOU ARE ACTUALLY PLAYING THEIR GAME!!!! YOU EVEN SAID

My intent here is have honest discussions with my fellow Americans and any international bloggers. I assure you, the majority of my political views are very liberal.

WTF?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

I DON'T UNDERSTAND, MAKARIOS / MR. P / KONSERVO!!

I THOUGHT WE WERE SOULMATES!!!!!!!

PLEASE TELL ME YOU HAVE NOT BEEN STRICKEN WITH LIBERALISM, WHICH MICHAEL SAVAGE EXPOSED IN HIS BOOK AS A MENTAL DISEASE!!!!!!!

WE NEED YOU WORKING ON THE SIDE OF THE LIGHT AND AGAINST PIAPS AND HER COMING TYRANNICAL REIGN!!!!!!!!

COME TO YOUR SENSES, MAN!!!!!!!!!!!

PJ said...

Read the Shahnameh. The Persians started everything ;)

The Epic of Kings By Ferdowsi
Written 1010 A.C.E.

Everything except timely, factual, written accounts of history it seems.

PJ said...

Sergei Andropov,

But I will read it anyway...

"Know thy enemy"


(pssst... Did you hear that fake RALPH?)

Sergei Andropov said...

It's a compilation of the ancient legends of Iran, so don't be too surprised if certain parts conflict with the historical record (e.g. King Jamshid discovering space travel, Zal being raised by a phoenix or a group of thirty talking chickens (depending on the translation), etc.). It's the single greatest work of literature in the Persian language, though, and stunningly beautiful even in translation.

PJ said...

sergei,

I really do plan on reading it when I find the time. School just started, so I want to make sure I have my priorities straight.

1) Homework

2) Misconstruing Persian literature and taking passages out of context to suit my own Western agenda. 8^)